
We are getting mixed messages. The federal government is telling us that homelessness is decreasing in cities across America. One of those cities, they state, is San Francisco.
I was in SF this past week. I’ve never been hit up more by panhandlers and people living on the streets in my frequent travels there, than last week. It seemed like almost every street corner, there was someone sleeping or panhandling. My first hand encounters just go against the claims of politicians who say “it’s getting better.”
Here in Southern California, the politicians say that homelessness decreased from 90,000 two years ago to 73,000 this year. Has homeless really decreased in Los Angeles, when we have barely built enough housing or shelters for just a handful of people?
It is now being reported that a tent city is starting to be developed in the Inland Empire, an hour east of Los Angeles, filled with people who lost their homes. The Inland Empire is known for where Angelenos move to, when they can’t afford the high rents and housing prices of Los Angeles. Yet, the latest mortgage crisis has hit this area hard. So now the result is a tent city filled with the newly homeless.
Am I being just overly pessimistic, or overly realistic?
In the campaign year of 2008, I’m done listening to the political jargon of false hope. I’d rather see for myself whether homelessness is increasing or decreasing. Until we actually see with our very eyes a dramatic decrease of people living on our streets, I won’t fall for the claims that homelessness is decreasing.
Maybe this is my new year’s resolution.
(Pic from www.inspi.ufl.edu)