
The columns by Steve Lopez of the LA Times a couple of years ago, and the recent infusion of city and county funds to address homelessness at about the same time, made advocates ecstatic. Not since a couple of decades ago, had Los Angeles seriously looked at homelessness.
Fast forward a couple of years to today, and I’m wondering if this window of “community goodwill” opportunity is fading. Of course, everyone is talking about the debate over Skid Row.
But is the heart of the Skid Row issue addressing homelessness in Los Angeles or simply trying to figure out how to make downtown Los Angeles more “loft friendly”? Cleaning up Skid Row is a good thing. But it is more about addressing the embarrassing criminal “free-for-all” in downtown than it is about the sad fact that Skid Row is ground zero for America’s homelessness.
So why do I think that perhaps the public interest on homelessness might be fading?
Consider the fact that over 200 of Los Angeles’ public and private civic leaders recently descended on Washington, DC—led by Mayor Villaraigosa—to lobby for additional funds for Los Angeles.They advocated for funding for transportation, anti-gang programs, education, and other very pertinent issues in Los Angeles.
But was homelessness included in this long list of priorities? NO.This, after the federal Housing and Urban Development department recently reduced Los Angeles’ allocation of homeless and housing funding by $12 million.
Yesterday, the City of Santa Monica hosted a conference on Homeless and Community Courts at the RAND Corporation. The usual speakers on homelessness in Los Angeles were there. The eerie feeling was that the same speakers spoke about the same issues, and the same reasons why homelessness is so prevalent in Los Angeles.
Lack of coordination, lack of funding, lack of affordable housing, no creative programs, lack of leadership… lack, lack, lack… The laundry list of why homelessness has overwhelmed Los Angeles sounds like ducks rattling off in the wind… lack, lack, lack…
When you hear this the first time, you are motivated to do something. When you hear it the second and third time, you are interested.
After three years of hearing the same message—lack, lack, lack… no leadership, no funding, no community will—you want to change the subject. Let’s talk about traffic now… how about those one way streets on Olympic and Pico? Let’s talk about education now… should the Mayor run the school district?
BUT let’s not talk about homelessness… are we ever going to help 90,000 homeless Angelenos get off the streets? Maybe it’s easier to build a $5 billion subway to the ocean or have the Mayor take over an entrenched school board than figure out what to do with 90,000 homeless people.
The glass on the window of opportunity where the community is advocating for real solutions to addressing homelessness has definitely turned from clear to opaque.
The question is… will this window stay open, or is it closing?