Friday, June 24, 2005

Panhandling in the South



There is an interesting article in the LA Times about panhandling in Atlanta, and how homelessness has also become a racial issue. (Click the title to read the article.)

It is interesting that the divisive issue of homelessness has also become a divisive racial issue. No matter what color a person might be, we all want homelessness to be solved. Rather than fight over the philosophical positions over homelessness, we should just get our butts in gear and solve it.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

Homelessness and Local Politics




This morning I was honored to attend Los Angeles Councilmember Jan Perry’s swearing-in ceremony for her second term in office. It was located at the impressive Alternative School in South Los Angeles. Among our current Mayor Hahn, Mayor-elect Villaraigosa, and a handful of council members, councilmember Perry was “roasted” by elected officials and community members.

A common thread throughout the speeches was her efforts to deal with our community’s approach to homelessness. Her district covers the downtown area—including Skid Row—as well as parts of South Los Angeles.

Homelessness cannot be ignored in her district. So she has utilized local politics among the business community, service providers, law enforcement, and community members to address this terrible societal problem.

It is encouraging to see local politicians address a controversial issue like homelessness…

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

You Just Earned $85,000!




If you are one of the fortunate souls in Los Angeles to own your own home—the value of your house jumped again this past year. The Los Angeles Daily Journal writes today that the median price of a house in San Fernando Valley is now $575,000, $85,000 more than last year. (Click title to read the article...)

$85,000… That’s better than winning a Fantasy 5 California lottery ticket every year. The odds of earning wealth through homeownership are better than buying a lottery ticket.

Unfortunately, the odds of a low-income renter in Los Angeles to purchase a home, gets worse every year. Imagine if you’re homeless. You probably have more of a chance to win the SuperLotto than to buy a home.

If you were to finance a $575,000 home mortgage, your payments would be $3,355 per month. (That is if you are wealthy enough to have a down payment…) Experts say that your mortgage payment (insurance and taxes) should be no more than 28% of your monthly income. That means you need to be taking home over $12,000 per month, or $144,000 per year to be able to purchase a home!

It is just not realistic for the average worker in Los Angeles. It is virtually impossible for a person who is homeless.

And we wonder why people end up living on the streets?

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

The Homeless Numbers Game




The headlines said it all: 90,000 homeless in our county. The number is indelible.

For most of us, we don’t need a slide rule to figure out that homelessness has increased. Anyone who exits a freeway off-ramp, who travels through our downtown neighborhoods, or even visits our world famous beaches knows that there are too many people in our community without homes.

The counting of homelessness has always been hotly debated. Some want to exaggerate the number to encourage more funding for services, others want to diminish the number to deny that there really is a problem. For a decade we’ve argued over this number, as if it was some statistical problem rather than a human dilemma.

So now we have a number, an official count. But in this homeless numbers game, there are other—some would say more important—numbers.

There is the dollars game. It is big business. In fact, this homeless count was a result of the dollars game. The federal government mandated that all communities, including ours, count the number of homeless or else their much needed funding would be cut. In Los Angeles County that means nearly $50 million per year of federal dollars.

Private fundraising for homeless services is also a high stake game of risk. If you don’t convince supporters that your charity is important, you risk closing your doors to people in need. I would estimate that private support of homeless services is six to ten times greater than federal funding in our community.

Then there is the affordable housing game. We all play this, whether homeless or not. It’s a sad game of musical chairs where there are too many players and not enough chairs. Round and round the people go, lurking and peering in closets and kitchens, hoping for an empty home to buy or rent. But when the music stops, there are always people left out with no place to call home.

This all reminds me of the game of monopoly. The urgency of gathering dollars, collecting property, and staying out of jail. At the expense of other players, we hoard these resources in order to win. It is a financial game of musical chairs. And people always lose. In the real world, the homeless lose.

So now we have this large number—90,000 homeless people. What does it mean?

Well, we obviously have a problem, a huge problem. If we wanted to build simple apartments for each person, it would cost our community billions of dollars.

We also know that the existing system of care is not solving the problem. Whether because of lack of funding or lack of coordinated services, our efforts over the past two decades to help the homeless have not improved the situation.

Clearly, this number, defines Los Angeles as the homeless capital of America, and shows that we need galvanized new leadership in this battle to end homelessness on our streets.

Our new mayor is tackling crucial community issues head one—education, crime, and traffic. I would hope that he and his new team provide the same visionary, out-of-the-box leadership in redesigning the approach to ending homelessness, as well.

The new numbers are a numbing reminder of the scope of the problem. What’s required now is the leadership to awaken our community to the need of immediate action.